HUPC Home Page Fare Thee Well! HUPC
Issue Updates
About the Uintas
We Are HUPC Our Reflections What You Can Do Join HUPC HUPC Archives

Mountain Goat Letter October 2000

October 4, 2000 Jack Blackwell Regional Forester, Intermountain Region Ogden, UT Bert Kulesza Forest Supervisor, Ashley National Forest Vernal, UT Bernie Weingardt Forest Supervisor, Wasatch-Cache National Forest SLC, UT

Dear Gentlemen: From the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Wildlife News, September 22, 2000, (UDWR Website):

“VERNAL – September has been a busy time for mammal and bird releases in the Uinta Basin. In a two-week period, biologists from the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources released chukar, Rocky Mountain goats and black-footed ferrets....

...On Sept. 19, nine Rocky Mountain goats were released into the Uinta Mountains. The goats, two males and seven females, were released on the Ashley National Forest near the Jefferson Park area above the Uinta River. Biologists predict this small herd will move up and settle in along the slopes of Mount Emmons....”

What more can be said? We have tried to engage all of you and your staffs on this issue for almost a decade now. We have played this insane game openly and honestly, never hiding our concerns or beliefs. We have argued on the basis of science, the available data, Forest Service wildlife and wilderness policy. We have provided you folks with factual information and data. We have met with all of you and your appropriate staffs numerous times. We have personal conversations, letters and notes dating back over a decade that this kind of nonsense should not be happening, that it will stop, that it was/is your intention to get control of this and appropriately halt it. We have been assured of studies and analyses. We have asked and been assured that we would be kept abreast of any actions pertaining to mt. goats on National Forest lands, particularly designated wilderness. All of this we have documented time and time again to you and others noted above. We can do so again. But it is clear all is for naught. We have not been treated with integrity, dignity or honesty.

Maybe all of this has occurred because of some super-power status harbored by UDWR, but more likely because of simple neglect. The hubris and intellectual dishonesty reflected by this issue stands out in my 25 year career in Utah, particularly knowing that what is happening on the Uintas (and elsewhere) runs counter to Forest Service policy and numerous direct statements to us over the years. Each of the decision makers and key staff officers, including yourself, know it!

UDWR’s statement clearly notes mt. goats are being placed on lands not suited as goat habitat--this has been consistent behavior on their part because even UDWR knows mt. goats don’t belong within the High Uintas Wilderness--with the intent for the goats to move into the High Uintas Wilderness (“...the slopes of Mt. Emmons”). And, not surprisingly, this has happened consistently. Whether from Whiterocks Canyon or now from Jefferson Park, all parties knew and know the goats will move into the High Uintas Wilderness. And they have done so...

The High Uintas Wilderness has been diminished by this process. Of that there is no doubt. Wilderness policy has been mocked--also, no doubt. The Forest Service has allowed UDWR to degrade wilderness, Forest Service wilderness management policy, public involvement and participation and shaded the agency’s integrity.

In the early or mid 1980s, as Bill Burbridge likes to note, I supported the concept of a mt. goat transplant based on the information provided to me by a Wasatch-Cache National Forest biologist. As we investigated and attempted to corroborate his information, we realized it was not factual or science-based information. Mt. goats are not a native species here and hence specifically should not be introduced in designated wilderness and should not, if the agency truly honors the language of ecosystem management, be introduced anywhere outside of their native habitats.

When confronted with this information we began what we imagined to be a long, but ultimately successful, effort at convincing the Forest Service that mt. goat introductions would be contrary to wilderness and wildlife policy. Instead, we have been confronted with obstinacy in the face of factual data. At times in meetings and correspondence I have portrayed the issue as a confrontation without a disputation-- because the primary Forest Service decision-makers have agreed, as we’ve already noted, that mt. goats do not belong in the High Uintas Wilderness. Yet here they are in the hundreds with more and more being introduced with Forest Service knowledge and capitulation.

It makes no sense. I’m sure some in the Forest Service and certainly within UDWR are glad to see HUPC lose this “battle.” But we aren’t the losers; tragically the High Uintas Wilderness is, as are Forest Service policy and integrity.

We again implore you to go back to step one and halt all transplants to and around all designated wildernesses. It is the only meaningful and right thing the Forest Service can and should do.


Dick Carter

cc: Mike Dombeck, Chief, U.S. Forest Service Pete Karp, Uinta National Forest Supervisor Kamas, Evanston/Mt. View, Duchesne/Roosevelt, Vernal and Flaming Gorge District Rangers

HUPC Home Page Our Reflections HUPC
Issue Updates
About the Uintas and Lakes Roadless Area
We Are HUPC Fare Thee Well! What You Can Do Join HUPC HUPC Archives